I’ve written several pieces on the “macro-succession” crisis I see facing American businesses. One challenge to my central thesis (which I’ve heard a few times, in fact) comes from people who think that the massive loss of institutional knowledge and expertise I predict as a result of Boomer retirements (which have already begun) won’t occur because many of these people are choosing to work past the age of 65 (and will continue to do so). The logic is economic – more and more people can’t afford to retire, goes the thinking.
My response has been that while I think this dynamic is a real one, I don’t believe it indicts my theory. Workers driven by economic factors are primarily line workers and lower-to-middle management. My concerns primarily address what’s happening at the senior management and executive levels, and these people don’t have significant money problems, by and large. Continue reading